Stiglitz: The underlying problem is that the US did not anticipate a rival such as China. Even without subsidies, China “could outcompete just because of the scale of their economy and the number of engineers they have.
Stiglitz: Our under-investment in engineering and their over-investment in engineering — that’s not a trade violation, it’s a strategic mistake. They put themselves in a comparative advantage, and we haven’t come to terms with that.”
China’s success in electric vehicles is also evidence for Stiglitz that, in climate policy, regulations often work better than subsidies. More than a decade ago, “I was in a meeting with the premier [Wen Jiabao] where he told the car companies: you have to be electric within five…
@pstAsiatech
financiers funded an early soviet union and hitlers germany. Capital goes where it will be used effectively, to societies with effective/cheap labor & organizational power to direct useful labor. Rothschilds had nixon open china. capital worthy business can later compete...shock
@pstAsiatech
You read economics! 👍👍👍 the size of economy depends on the size of the population but good quality ppl! 😂😂😂 so imagine a country with less than 0.35bill ppl to challenge a country with more than 5000 yrs civilization n good quality ppl at 1.4bill is just insane!
@pstAsiatech
It goes deeper than this. Societal indiscipline, declining social standards, falling education standards, financialization, reserve currency , globalisation… the list goes on.