Starting a business in SF is extremely difficult. Proposed process streamlining is not going far enough. Opening a restaurant in the Mission is as tough as opening a strip club & requires a @sfplanning hearing which “community stakeholders” often abuse to harass newcomers.🧵 /1

With the proposed legislation before the @sfbos , restaurant & bar applications within Mission NCT zoning still require a multi-month/year Conditional Use Authorization (CUA) with a public hearing. Nothing is changing! /2

CUA process in the Mission is required for businesses such as “gas station”, “large scale urban agriculture” and “adult business” aka strip clubs. Very disproportionate to apply the same standard for bars and restaurants. /3

Only in the Mission, Planning code has a 179 cap for eating and drinking places (that includes ice cream shops) when we have a heartbreaking 75% vacancy rate from 14th street to Cesar Chavez. /4

BTW imagine needing to figuring out how many “eating places” (cafes, ice cream shops, delis, restaurants) exist, and also determine if more less 25% of street frontage is eating place on your block. Applicants must prove that or be denied. Who came up with this?? /5

Examples: what hours we should be open, what color swatches and decorations they approve, details of our menu items. Countless meetings are wasted to appease these demands by random people from unaccountable “coalitions”! /7

I have wasted days & weeks putting together absurd paperwork, 300’ radius research, print shops, producing 1000s of envelopes, campaigned & collected 130 letters of support and 1500 signatures for my business to avoid going bankrupt due to opposition or delays. /8

All of this to open a wine bar restaurant and music venue that supports hundreds of musicians, performers, vendors, farmers, winemakers and my 20 staff. This process is being abused and it is time for it to stop. /9

My recent job posting for a cook got 100s of applications. Working class, immigrants, young dreamers are back but SF can’t place them all. Fellow merchants on the corridor say business is slow, might have to close. More job seekers in the making. /10

We need to find reasonable ways to protect vulnerable existing businesses and preserve the history and culture of this corridor without gatekeeping or discriminating against newcomers. Don’t allow normal citizens to be victims of political power plays. /11

As long as a new business follows all the million city building, planning, police, fire and other required codes, this should be streamlined to be outright “Permitted”, end of story. /12

If we truly want to revitalize our commercial corridors, also in the Mission, which is one of the last neighborhoods in the city to recover economically, we need to stop identity politics and uplift ALL. /13

@nazkhorram This is the point of the system. SF is supposed to be for the radical left, first and foremost. Business owners should respect that or move to another city.

@jeremiahscholl You point seems to be very irrelevant to me. No one talked about radical left. Also, who makes these rules you’re talking about? Ask them if we live in a dictatorship or in democracy for me.