๐จ๐จChief Justice Roberts often casts the deciding vote on cases when SCOTUS decisions are tied. It's not a good look for Roberts to be socializing with Prosecutor Jack Smith who brought the immunity case against Trump๐ Is "the fix" in?
If you were Trump, how would this makeโฆ
@jessies_now
No it is not interference judges and lawyers speak all the time. Roberts usually takes the safe non-controversial position on important issues. In that sense he is a follower not a leader.
@DDFuhrman
So you wouldn't be upset by that ....socializing......if you were Trump & waiting for a decision? Precedents being set? My husband was an attorney. He took SCOTUS very seriously & tried cases in Federal court. He never socialized with anyone involved prior to the case beingโฆ
@PatriotJackIII
@ArmedPatriot45
they have to interact w/one another but looks suspicious to me in a social setting......that denotes a relationship. He can say it's just business but even so, they could communicate via emails, texts, discovery, documents....not dinner one on one & no one is privy to thatโฆ
@annielnyc
There can be no "cronyism" in a situation like this. A man's future is at stake here. The fact that they ARE having dinner makes it look "shady" to me. The whole case is unconstitutional. The two of them should correspond...definitely.... thru emails, texts, documents, etc. butโฆ
@jessies_now
When we succeed at calling an Article V convention(Convention of States), We The People will be able to drain the swamp (permanently!) and propose amendments through the STATES to undo decades of harmful legislation that has landed us with a corrupt, runaway federal government.