@edokonrad
Edo Konrad
1 year
Why do so-called precision strikes end with dead Palestinian kids? Because the army literally authorizes these strikes knowing civilians will be killed, and do so as long as the number is deemed low enough. Don’t believe me? Ask former IDF soldiers:
171
529
845

Replies

@VictorNakba
Nakba
1 year
@edokonrad Thanks Edo.
Tweet media one
0
0
4
@AdinHaykin1
Adin - עדין
1 year
@edokonrad אז שאלה, האם אתה יכול לציין דוגמה אחת לקמפיין צבאי אווירי בהיסטוריה שלא התקיף מתוך ידיעה שאזרחים כנראה יהרגו?
0
0
15
@radaniya67
Sinan “the Jew Pirate” Reis🇮🇱✡︎ 🏴‍☠️🍌🚁
1 year
@edokonrad Edo, you clearly not a child. Do you think as precise as it is, there won’t be any casualties
4
1
14
@Masraya1979
Yasmin 🇪🇬🇵🇸 🍉
1 year
@edokonrad but it's acceptable to you for the illegal occupier to kill the armed resistance?
8
0
3
@arsawatt
Dan
1 year
@edokonrad Human shields are a war crime
1
0
5
@edokonrad Maybe "Palestinians" shouldn't put the children near the weapons, then. Who is it that doesn't value children? Methinks you are confused. #PalestinianLies
0
0
2
@hearNtalk
SpeakUp 🎗️
1 year
@edokonrad Based on your logic, what does a terrorist need to do to avoid being attacked?…
0
0
4
@hearNtalk
SpeakUp 🎗️
1 year
@edokonrad What do you say to Palestinians militants who risk lives of Palestinian children?
@redbrasco
RedBrasco - RedLehi
1 year
Palestinian terrorists are now using roadside bombs in heavily populated areas. An IED attack took place earlier today in Nablus. There were no IDF casualties, but some children suffered minor injuries.
38
95
178
0
1
12
@RobertGlassman6
Dr Schlemiel
1 year
@edokonrad Under international law, collateral damage, esp civilian casualties, is justified in war if it can pass what's known as the proportionality test, which means that the direct military advantage to be gained in an attack is greater than the collateral damage an attack Yes here
3
1
14
@lion_4_zion
🎗️Moshe ✡︎
1 year
@edokonrad Here’s your answer, Edo
2
5
21
@dailydishwater
Just Quoting
1 year
@edokonrad That's following the letter of international military law. US and UK do it too. Question the choise of the particular incident, not the principle. The fact that Gazan militants are often close to citizens does not give Gazan forces carte blanche to do anything w/o reprisal
0
1
16
@anatoly11245
anatoly ✡️ 🟦
1 year
Tweet media one
0
4
18
@Andrea04211697
Andrea
1 year
@yaakovkatz
Yaakov Katz
1 year
Take a good look at these images. What you see are buildings targeted but not the whole building, just a floor, on top or the bottom. Think how much planning, intel & accurate tech is required. Anyone who claims Israel is disproportionate does not understand warfare.
62
94
315
0
1
5
@hshu22
howard shubert
1 year
@edokonrad Most professional militaries weigh civilian casualties against the necessity of removing military targets, if the target is important enough the attack goes through. Of course Israel could simply fire 1000's of rockets at cities without precision like HAMAS!
1
1
13
@ZioReplyGuy
ZioReplyGuy
1 year
@edokonrad Who authorized these attacks on civilians?
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
0
0
13
@ZioReplyGuy
ZioReplyGuy
1 year
@edokonrad I'm convinced Edo Konrad has never spoken to a Palestinian
Tweet media one
0
0
9
@edokonrad
Edo Konrad
1 year
@JAsayuel הלכתי. מה עכשיו?
1
0
1