Why do so-called precision strikes end with dead Palestinian kids? Because the army literally authorizes these strikes knowing civilians will be killed, and do so as long as the number is deemed low enough. Don’t believe me? Ask former IDF soldiers:
@edokonrad
Maybe "Palestinians" shouldn't put the children near the weapons, then. Who is it that doesn't value children? Methinks you are confused.
#PalestinianLies
Palestinian terrorists are now using roadside bombs in heavily populated areas.
An IED attack took place earlier today in Nablus. There were no IDF casualties, but some children suffered minor injuries.
@edokonrad
Under international law, collateral damage, esp civilian casualties, is justified in war if it can pass what's known as the proportionality test, which means that the direct military advantage to be gained in an attack is greater than the collateral damage an attack Yes here
@edokonrad
That's following the letter of international military law. US and UK do it too. Question the choise of the particular incident, not the principle. The fact that Gazan militants are often close to citizens does not give Gazan forces carte blanche to do anything w/o reprisal
Take a good look at these images. What you see are buildings targeted but not the whole building, just a floor, on top or the bottom. Think how much planning, intel & accurate tech is required. Anyone who claims Israel is disproportionate does not understand warfare.
@edokonrad
Most professional militaries weigh civilian casualties against the necessity of removing military targets, if the target is important enough the attack goes through. Of course Israel could simply fire 1000's of rockets at cities without precision like HAMAS!