@fryingpanpods @CinematicSpot its canon to the MCU, which means canonically it came first. not to mention came first in our time aswell Tweet added by natalie @crimumin

natalie

3 years

@fryingpanpods @CinematicSpot its canon to the MCU, which means canonically it came first. not to mention came first in our time aswell

6

1

397

Cinematic

@Cinematic_Hub

3 years

Spider-Man 2002 is technically the first MCU movie. #SpiderManNoWayHome

203

2K

28K

Out of the Frying Pan Into the Fire

@fryingpanpods

3 years

@CinematicSpot No, it technically isn't. I'm not sure where people keep getting that idea

6

0

67

your Favorite hooligan

@ghostfade2k

3 years

@vampirenazuna @fryingpanpods @CinematicSpot Blade

1

0

natalie

@crimumin

3 years

@ghostfade2k @fryingpanpods @CinematicSpot we dont know if its apart of the MCU yet, probably will be but as of right now it isnt

2

0

Out of the Frying Pan Into the Fire

@fryingpanpods

3 years

@vampirenazuna @CinematicSpot It's not canon to the mcu. It's canon to the multiverse. The MCU is only one universe in the larger Marvel multiverse. These movies did not take place in the MCU

2

0

82

Jace

@BasedJace_

3 years

@vampirenazuna @fryingpanpods @CinematicSpot The MCU and the Sam Raimi universe are two different timelines/universes. Tobey's Spider-Man and villians just merely visited the MCU and went back to the Raimi-verse. The 1st movie in the MCU (Marvel Cinematic UNIVERSE) is still Iron Man.

2

0

11

i have 12 rings

@A1Consumer

3 years

@vampirenazuna @fryingpanpods @CinematicSpot so then, how is it not the first spider-man? considering willam defoes goblin is also back, how is that any less canon than doc ock?

1

0

1

Replies