As others have pointed out, the phrase “buy back” is inaccurate because it implies that citizens buy their guns from the gov’t.
For that reason, the phrasing is also a window into the progressive mind, which believes that the state is the source of *everything* you have.
@cjscalia
@DLoesch
aaaaaannnd the Govt would be giving you the same money they already took from you to force you to dispose of property you legally purchased and own. It’s a sham
@cjscalia
@sweetjaney63
This action is a cousin to immanent domain in one way, but banned from happening because of our blessed Constitution.
If they want a optional voluntary “buyback” than the cost should be at min. Market value, not absurd $100/property unit
@cjscalia
@tkinder
Democrats need us unable to defend ourselves, on the plantation and reliant upon the government for most everything for the sake of their political survival.
@cjscalia
@SebGorka
Los Angeles has had several of these "Buy Backs" where you get money if you turn in your firearm. It is such a load of garbage. Do you think the "bad guys" are going to turn in their firearms for cash? No way. It's such a sham.
@cjscalia
Francis. His name is Francis, his mother named him Francis. If he will lie about his given name he will lie about anything else, even being a Mexican! Francis.
@cjscalia
None of my firearms are for sale now and I don't intend to put them up for sale any time in the near future. I will sell them when I determine I'm too old safely use them and will not be to the Government. So, go pee on an electric fence for an hour or so Beto.