I also don't like mankads as a form of dismissal because minus the drama around them, they're boring. If cricket can find a way to make it penalty runs, that'd be much better.
But this is for when were ready to have nuanced conversations about this. 😬
@afidelf
Andrew, while you are 100% correct, surely that is tangential to a mankad that clearly showed intent to run out rather than play; Dean is in when the bowl “would have been bowled”. Like deepti as a cricketer but that was as gamesman as scoring past a goalkeeper who’s injured
@IsthatDoc
Didn't see the incident.
Also think Mankads should be five penalty runs rather than a dismissal, because it's a boring way to get someone out.
But you can't expect people who grew up in a different cricket cultures to attach the same moral weight to a legal act.
@afidelf
And coz spirit of cricket can't evaolve with time as well cz it has "white" written all over it , ain't that right ?
Or
It has to always suit the white privilege ?
Stop bringing race into this and if someone still has to cry and bring hashtags , bring'em to
@ICC
2 chng rules!!!
@afidelf
This has got nothing to do with colour. It’s just ‘not cricket’ whatever player had done it. I would have been as angry if it had been an English, NZ, Australian…player that had done it. The game was slipping away from India and they resorted to desperate underhand tactics
The institution that decides what the “spirit of cricket” is, made Mike Gatting (someone who took a rebel team to apartheid South Africa) their President in 2013. He is now chairman of the World Cricket Committee. Maybe that’s the sort of thing we should all be talking about?
@afidelf
And that so called 'spirit of cricket' says that when u can't show spirit of cricket by yourself u can be neglected but if u r in opposite side u can cry like a baby ...lol