@abakcus
Abakcus
2 months
The simplest way to visualize the set of numbers. Utterly useful diagram!❤️ []
Tweet media one
23
698
4K

Replies

@apexlearn_org
Tony Zhang
2 months
@abakcus This is why if you don’t know math you life is only black and white
5
0
1
@NathaliaLeHen
Nathalia Le Hen
2 months
@abakcus And this : 😯
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
0
6
19
@albertfeynman
Garry W Briggs
2 months
@abakcus ... need to update for SUPERCOMPLEX OPERATOR j where j*j = +1 (UNITY) ...
0
0
0
@WayneMassey
Wayne Massey
2 months
@abakcus Too bad it leaves out Quaternions, Octonions and the like.
2
0
3
@slaughter_won
I, Musician
2 months
@abakcus I love this
0
0
0
@mouse_math
little grey mouse 🐭
2 months
Tweet media one
2
2
18
@DeeTaylor102
Ra's Al Ghul
2 months
@abakcus I always thought it was ridiculous to play with imaginary numbers. I was very good at math though, but thought there was no practical application and I didn't want to be a math teacher.
0
0
0
@lasz02
Jorge Zalas
2 months
1
0
1
@EdgardoTempore1
Edgardo Temporetti
2 months
@abakcus 👌👌
0
0
0
@MichaelDunwort1
⏳ Michael Dunworth⌛️
2 months
0
0
0
@TheNewsBrian
Brian Day
2 months
0
0
0
@bob123m
Robert Marchese
2 months
@abakcus Here's another way to expand the Reals. The list after the R is the number of dimension that square to +1, -1 and 0. So complex is R(0,1,0). Details (and history of 0, N, Z, Q and R) in this video:
Tweet media one
0
0
2
@MedeirosdCRISTO
Professor Medeiros de Cristo - PROJETO MIRZAM🌌
2 months
@abakcus And what about hyper-reals and hyper-complex?
1
0
1
@Sam583569
Sam
2 months
@abakcus 0 is not natural though
0
0
1
@Fistroman1
Fistroman - 1 entre 26 millones
2 months
@abakcus The funny detail is when you realize YOU CAN STILL SAY ones are contained in the others...perfectly And at the same time, you can say all of them has the same cardinality
0
0
0
@TheDhananjay100
Dhananjay
2 months
@abakcus Magic.
0
0
0
@freekwiedijk
Freek Wiedijk 🎲
2 months
@abakcus Now add the q-numbers 🤗
0
0
2
@ericbuscodama
la parole juste , la voix du sage
2 months
@abakcus les nombres complexes , j'ai jamais rien compris , j'ai dû zapper quelque chose
1
0
0
@SynapticSage
ℜ𝗒an (sigmoid.social/@SynapticSage)
2 months
@abakcus Needs a third dimension for quaternions :) (For computer graphics folks) Let’s ignore octonions — only string theorists use those 🤷‍♂️
0
0
0
@subaasaaa
Mehran
2 months
@abakcus I enjoyed
0
0
0