@TheEvertonian78 The fact that you can’t see it’s Matip and not Van Dijk says all it needs to really

@Frosty_The_Duck After the tweet I said I meant Matip not VVD. Amazing what coverage a small accident can cause

@TheEvertonian78 It wasn’t Virgil ?

@TheEvertonian78 It was Matip wasn’t it?

@TheEvertonian78 @GetVideoBot

@TheEvertonian78 For one its matip n 2 lol there goal shouldn’t of even stood lol

@TheEvertonian78 Van Dijk didn’t handle it?

@TheEvertonian78 Van dijk Yh 😭😭

@TheEvertonian78 The ball was no where near Van Dijks hand

@TheEvertonian78 Firstly that’s not Van dijk and secondly if you knew the laws of football you would understand why that ain’t a handball and thirdly the trajectory of ball shows it wouldn’t have gotten to Haaland

@TheEvertonian78 It’s matip

@TheEvertonian78 We do what we want

@TheEvertonian78 Course it’s worse for you, cos it’s about us and not you lot

@TheEvertonian78 It hit his head first so it classed as not hand ball hope that helps you understand 👍

@TheEvertonian78 Natural hand position mate.

@TheEvertonian78 He still would’ve missed

@TheEvertonian78 also they would of checked it if they didn’t scored moments later

@TheEvertonian78 He was holding himself up with his hand (hand makes contact with ground before ball hits it) and so that’s 100% allowed in the laws of the game

@TheEvertonian78 Don't let any facts get in the way of your tediously persistent anti LFC axe to grind polemics.. 😉 😂😂😂