Bhukuji,
@MumbaichaDon
your thread is one-sided and incomplete. Few things need to be carefully considered. It's a
#shame
that a prominent RW handle like you just writes 'POLITICIAN' without specifying a name.
The
#Maharashtra
Politics-- (long read)
🔸Eknath Khadse--One of Senior Most BJP leaders. Worked hard for Party. Served as Leader of opposition from Nov 09 to Oct 14. His successful tenure exposing Corrupt UPA in Assembly helped BJP win 2014 election along with Modi Wave. Was one…
🔸Eknath Khadse - There were allegations against Eknath Khadse when he was the Revenue Minister. If these allegations had no basis, would he have had to resign from his post?
Even assuming that his resignation was the result of internal politics, shouldn't the High Court have
🔸Chandrashekhar Bawankule - The decision to not grant a ticket to Bawankule in 2019 was not made by DF but by the Central Parliamentary Board (CPB). If you claim that DF was responsible for Bawankule's ticket not being allotted, then why was Bawankule allowed to be
appointed to the Legislative Council and become the state president of Maharashtra? Interestingly, Bawankule has never expressed any concerns about this.
🔸Vinod Tawde - It is quite absurd to suggest that DF sidelined all these individuals for the seat. Even if tickets were granted to Khadse, Bawankule, or Tawde, they were not contenders for the CM's post after the 2019 assembly elections. After DF held power for five consecutive
🔸Pankaja Munde - I'd like to point out that you remember Pankaja Mundhe for criticism but not Poonam Mahajan?
Has Poonam Mahajan been appointed to any Union Ministerial position? She has been serving as an MP for the last two terms.
Poonam Mahajan :
This seems to indicate a one-sided perspective. When you claim that Pankaja lost due to INTERNAL CONSPIRACY, you provide no evidence or substantiation.
For your information, Pankaja lost by more than 30K votes, indicating that the people of Parli had clearly decided against her. If INTERNAL CONSPIRACY were the cause, would she have lost by such a wide margin?
Pankaja, who consistently criticized the central leadership despite her loss in the Assembly election, the Central Parliamentary Board appointed her as National Secretary.
🔸Nilesh Rane - The fact is that Bawankule was overlooked even after visiting his constituency. Nilesh Rane's dissatisfaction was not with DF but with Bawankule. Mr. Rane himself mentioned in a press conference that DF made a significant contribution to Narayan Rane becoming a
Union Minister. The Rane family doesn't operate under any pressure. If not, they would openly express their concerns by naming the individuals involved. Rane has done this in the past. Please refrain from misleading people without evidence.
Konkan was the stronghold of Shiv Sena, and it's true that there were only a few BJP representatives there. However, the situation is now changing after the alliance broke, with the Rane family playing a significant role in supporting this change.
You criticized DF by naming all the above BJP leaders, but there wasn't sufficient evidence to support your claims; perhaps it was merely speculation. I believe that the BJP wouldn't consider such a significant leadership decision based on the preferences of just one individual.
A compelling example demonstrating that the Central Parliamentary Board doesn't solely heed DF's influence is the appointment of a DCM even when they might not have had prior knowledge or input.