2017 Crypto called and is jealous of 2021 Crypto.
@investvoyager
has continued to grow rapidly in 2021. This growth has come at short term costs. My latest update on Voyage(r) to the Cosmos. Its packed full of graphs, estimates, and opinions. $VGX $VYGVF
27
81
385
Replies
@PatrickAckerman
@investvoyager
Hi
@PatrickAckerman
I don’t quite get the AUM chart. On the x-axis you have the AUM in trillions but Voyager AUM is in the billions right now … right? What is the mistake I’m making? Because the way I read it, the stock is overvalued right now and that can’t be the case :)
1
0
0
@ObjectiveRails
@investvoyager
I applied Metcalfe’s law on AUM to smooth out the exponential growth of AUM and make it more of a linear relationship.
1
0
4
@PatrickAckerman
@investvoyager
Thanks for the great article Pat! Totally agree man! Vgx to the moon over time! Great company, great team, great community! Love you all! Let's stick through this together and help however we can!
1
0
17
@PatrickAckerman
@investvoyager
As usual Patrick always states
#Facts
.
#FactsNotFear
He never exaggerates, and uses
#Metcalfes
law. If you were unfamiliar with that you should not be in the
#crypto
world. His knowledge and expertise is highly appreciated by many on at
@medium
. RT
0
1
23
@PatrickAckerman
@investvoyager
Buying Vgx for $4 now is like buying Bitcoin at $5-6K. Let’s gooooo 🚀🚀🚀
1
1
28
@PatrickAckerman
@investvoyager
Thanks once more for thoughtful ideas! As always great content!
0
0
5
@PatrickAckerman
@investvoyager
Problem w/ML model is not the token swap, it’s the expected network effect is flawed 2 ways: 1. funded accounts doesn’t = VGX holders; 2. 90% of the VGX action is off network (Binance, etc). There is no network effect. Still super bullish on VGX but Metcalfe’s Law is inapplicable
1
0
3
@PatrickAckerman
@investvoyager
I’ve been having issues w my transfer on voyager and my money just disappeared. No sign of it on the other end, just says pending...
0
0
1
