@melancoffee1 @plurasmorgan @SoupTransphobes It was a conservative tweet that was like "put 10 women and 90 men on an island and they'll thrive, put 10 trans women and 90 men on an island and you'll find 100 dead men in a century" or something

@burner4_fun @RhoKuri @plurasmorgan @SoupTransphobes only if you concede to the notion that individuals with conditions or genetics that lead to an inability to concieve means they are also "not men/women." In which case, you'd be a fucking moron.

@burner4_fun @melancoffee1 @RhoKuri @plurasmorgan @SoupTransphobes nobodies really arguing the point, but much more the validity of it. like okay, sure they would die, but like what does that matter exactly? what are you proving? its complete nonesense

@burner4_fun @NothinbutDrawn @RhoKuri @plurasmorgan @SoupTransphobes how? because reproduction is a necessity to confirm ones gender? Again, your argument falls at the notion that other biological factors lead to the inability to reproduce, thus making the argument moot. hell, there are animals that don't reproduce.

@burner4_fun @melancoffee1 @RhoKuri @plurasmorgan @SoupTransphobes It doesnt matter that most cis women can, as the existance of those who can't prove the metric of "can they make a baby" is unreliable and shouldnt be used. I'd think you should understand this, but something tells me you aren't just pretending to be dense.