Live Action Cybertron film? "Ahh, the CGI would be too expensive " - Paramount. Here's a cheap, yet good solution. Use YoloPark quality models and make it in stop motion. Travis Knigth and his studio
@LAIKAStudios
would do a PHENOMENAL JOB I'm sure!
like, as a professional stop motion animator, there’s a very good financial reason that every single movie post 1990 uses CGI special effects instead of stop motion
@MooXProductions
I’ve been building puppets & stop mo puppets for 15 years (including Universal Studios Transformers costumes) & for me, robots are so much less interesting to create than human, animal, or fantastical characters.
@MooXProductions
Movies would take like 10 years to make, I mean that’s probably an exaggeration but stop motion is not an easy thing to do and is very time consuming
@MooXProductions
Boy, have I ever told how I decided to make stop motion for my college project due to my Multimedia course cause I said "it's easy".
How wrong I was. Still worked out well, but had to do an internship in the college cause my classroom was the background of the action, lol
@MooXProductions
The only reason travis knight and the team at Laika get to do what they do is because his father is the owner of nike and he can just make an absolutely spectacular film, that bombs at box office
@MooXProductions
Well.. In a way it is. BUT doesn't mean it's actually cheaper. Tons of work will need to be put in there. Especially if it's done by 1 person...
Stop motion isnt a bad idea but... No. It wouldn't work.
@MooXProductions
I won't claim to be an expert on CGI or Stop Motion
But a good stop motion movie like Kubo cost $60 million, the most recent transformers movie cost $200 million.
So if CGI is cheaper, then its not being used properly if its budget goes this much higher.