@Locked_Seahawks 100% yes! But I was thier before the combine

@Locked_Seahawks Absolutely…in fact, it might be beneficial to let Geno go and save all that cap space to fill in many gaps with younger FAs that will hang around and develop draft picks….you’d be closer to a SB appearance with this stance.

@Locked_Seahawks Yessssss

@Locked_Seahawks Yes

@Locked_Seahawks If Anderson and Carter gone when 5 comes up

@Locked_Seahawks Not at #5 ...

@Locked_Seahawks I think with the new QB coach and a couple years apprenticing, Seattle is one of the best places for him to go to. Going to the wrong team could be a disaster for him.

@Locked_Seahawks If he's there at #5 they should run the card to the podium. It's just too bad Indianapolis blew their game on route to pick #4 ; that ending was painful to watch. I'd feel much safer getting our QBOF there, than thinking it's a guarantee at #5 . Feels like minimum 3 QBs go in top 4

@Locked_Seahawks Yupp

@Locked_Seahawks Yes

@Locked_Seahawks One year (actually 9 games) wonder 33yr old Geno for 30 million or Lock/Richardson and 3 starters via free agency on defense?

@Locked_Seahawks Yes!

@Locked_Seahawks I’d rather see Stroud

@Locked_Seahawks No

@Locked_Seahawks This is the only QB im interested in. This QB1 IMO

@Locked_Seahawks Not at the expense of the o line and d line

@Locked_Seahawks I’m glad all you guys are not our GM’s. 🤣

@Locked_Seahawks I would move UP from 5 to draft him. Do you wanna miss the next Patrick M and/or Josh Allen (but even faster with more upside)?

@Locked_Seahawks

@Locked_Seahawks The show he put on at the combine was just stupid. What a game changer. For me, the question is not; Should Seattle draft Richardson? My question is; Will Seattle have to trade up to get him?