@LabourDead
DeadLabour
1 year
I now see Bordiga like Domenico Losurdo a powerful but dangerous weapon that should be used sparingly. A man that produces amazingly aerodyte points and observations but also someone that's overall political project is probably harmful and suspect for human freedom.
1
0
17

Replies

@LabourDead
DeadLabour
1 year
Re-reading "The Fundamentals Of Revolutionary Communism" reminded me how fucked up and insane Bordiga actually is
8
1
66
@LabourDead
DeadLabour
1 year
And how amazingly close it is to trotskyism. Really Bordiga is just an ultra trotskyist
2
0
13
@LabourDead
DeadLabour
1 year
Labour army's. Infinite war communism. Consumption being regulated by rationing and almost of production diverted to war production. Declaring war on the entire planet. Everything centerized into the hands of the party state. Nothing outside the stateNothing against the state.
1
0
21
@LabourDead
DeadLabour
1 year
Honestly I feel like the mountains of skulls and oceans of blood and all the repression unleashed by the October revolution would have been worth it if it all worked out. But it didn't the state wasn't placed in chain and drowned and the transition to higher phase communism...
1
0
16
@LabourDead
DeadLabour
1 year
Didn't occur. This to me makes Bordiga someone just lost in the romance and myth of 1917. Someone who really has no answers to any concrete problems or the actually state of things and therefore just restorts to conspiracy theory's about revisionism or opportunism
2
0
18
@LabourDead
DeadLabour
1 year
Like any other Trotskyist or Maoists. His fundamental political analysis is this: I AM NOT IN CHARGE AND THATS WHY EVERYTHING IS WRONG. Like any good bolshevik everything is reduced to political determinism and the crisis of the world revolution is a crisis of leadership.
2
1
20