What’s over and underrated in SEO?
My top 3:
📈overrated
1. Core Web Vitals
2. Content length
3. Alt tags
📉underrated
1. Brand combination searches
2. Content depth
3. Visuals
What are yours?
@Kevin_Indig
Disagree on core web vitals especially on paid and email traffic. This very often uses custom query string which then bypass all speed opto and end up being super slow sessions
@Kevin_Indig
📈overrated
1. More than 1 H1
2. Meta descriptions
3. CWV
📉underrated
1. Internal linking
2. Paths to Satisfaction (relevant links to sub topics)
3. Conversion metrics (beyond the click)
Cheers
@Kevin_Indig
I think this essentially proves that if you get 50 SEOs in a room, you’ll get at least 25 different opinions. The other 25 folks have been in the trenches and know what works! Cheers
@Kevin_Indig
Underrated: meta descriptions
CTR is under-invested in imo and with g not always respecting meta descriptions, they have become under valued
@Kevin_Indig
CWV 100%, why is everyone so obsessed with it. It's obviously great to have a fast af site, but rarely is it the difference between 1&10.
Could you clarify what you mean by visuals?
@Kevin_Indig
I disagree and think alt text is a lot of the times underrated. A lot of people under estimate the power of Google Image Search. Alt text is helping that image rank as well as screen readers.
@treycopeland
I've never seen much meaningful traffic coming through image search unless the business is heavily built around images, of course (like Pinterst)
@Kevin_Indig
overrated:
only producing long-form content
underrated:
building a base library of content covering everything related to a topic, regardless of keyword difficulty
@Kevin_Indig
📈overrated
1. CWV - most speed issues can be fixed by a good host
2. Algo updates - if you’re doing the right thing you’ll be fine
3. Exact match URLs
📉underrated
1. Google Search Console
2. Backlinks - bread & butter of SEO
3. Internal linking