@InfoAgeStrategy
Dr. Fred Hoffman, LTC USAR (ret.) ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
5 months
Why the U.S. didnโ€™t provide #Ukraine with many more M-2 Bradleys than we did is an utter mystery to me. 40-year-old, combat-proven technology successfully goes toe-to-toe with the best equipment the #Russian army has in the field today.
212
981
6K

Replies

@x_Elysium_x
Vlad
5 months
@InfoAgeStrategy US doesn't want Ukraine to win?
9
1
80
@BErickson_BIO
Brent Erickson
5 months
@InfoAgeStrategy That is insane. The US Army operates around 3,700 Bradley Fighting Vehicles and holds an additional 2,800 in storage.Jan 3, 2024 (European Security and Defense). Does Biden need permisson form Congress to send used mothballed equipment?
19
25
187
@Derekintherain
Derek Kelly ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
5 months
@InfoAgeStrategy They see it as a crisis to be "managed," not a war. History will not be kind to Biden and his clever manipulators.
7
4
91
@ALETTAHA
ALETTAHA๐Ÿ’Ž๐Ÿค—๐Ÿ’œ๐ŸŒž
5 months
@InfoAgeStrategy It is an utter mystery to all of us.
2
0
7
@Pasquinalle
Pasquino Marforio
5 months
@InfoAgeStrategy That would be a 40-year-old, combat-proven technology, that still costs over a million, a piece, to field, and it gets killed by a 700 dollar drone. Do the math. Actually, look up something called a Military Technical Revolution and a Revolution in Military Affairs. c. 1995.
3
0
6
@cwsuth1
CraigS
5 months
@InfoAgeStrategy It's not about winning for the U.S it's about prolonging the war for as long as possible. After 20 years of military profits in Afghanistan, Ukraine is its replacement.
1
0
4
@SachiGortchi
Sachi "muted by Freespeech-Elon" Gortchi
5 months
Tweet media one
0
0
3
@MariaJagcat
Marie
5 months
@InfoAgeStrategy WH policy of "russia is here to stay" so no point defeating russia.
0
1
20
@_walt_1
Wolfgang Alt ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
5 months
@InfoAgeStrategy @JKleinschmidtIR White House fear of too much Ukrainian success, too quick? Even good-willed geopolitics cost lives to protect other lives. #Bradley #Bradleys #Ukraine
1
0
8
@MatBabiak
๐•ธ๐–†๐–™ โœ™
5 months
@InfoAgeStrategy Because the US isn't being serious about winning
1
0
34
@Marialinden301
Annamaria Borino
5 months
@InfoAgeStrategy Because they didn't want Ukraine to win.
0
2
35
@b4igo2
ptom hasb
5 months
@InfoAgeStrategy Perhaps foolishly, I still hope 400 of the โ€˜Moroccanโ€™ lot get transshipped to ukr stat. The US of old wouldโ€™ve done that.
0
0
1
@BirdingFella
Birding Fella ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿฆ
5 months
@InfoAgeStrategy They seem to be outperforming the Leopards I and IIs. Amazing.
0
0
2
@VictorishB123
Crosspatch-ish ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
5 months
@InfoAgeStrategy @seadawg7878 We gave them what we had that was ready to use. The rest of the Bradley vehicles we have in storage are mostly worn out junk that would need to be stripped down to the hull and re-manufactured. The ODS Bradleys were upgraded and stored in good shape.
2
0
3
@JohnPokerBrown
John Brown
5 months
@InfoAgeStrategy It doesn't surprise me anymore because as soon as they see it works too well, then they immediately cut it because it ruins their preferred course of a negotiated settlement cough cough (land for peace deal).
0
0
1
@Cnsjs8
Cnsjs
5 months
@InfoAgeStrategy Because they did too well. The WH didnt expect the bradleys do as well as they did, limited bradleys limits Ukraine capabilities to attack russia
0
0
1
@DroidNChill
Sunshine is da best disinfectant
5 months
@InfoAgeStrategy Because they are too effective. Thatโ€™s the only reason. Also they only reason thru are sending 500 scrap ish to morroco. Ukraine would have get most of them in working order.
0
1
8
@Dios_svk
Economรฏst Fella๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ
5 months
@InfoAgeStrategy It seems they take advice from Charap, who wrote that Western tech won't make any difference in the theatre. The opposite is the truth.
2
2
26
@CNNDumpOfficial
CNN Breaking News
5 months
@InfoAgeStrategy Biden maybe wanted to keep some to fight off the insurrectionists!?
0
0
1