@InfoAgeStrategy
Dr. Fred Hoffman, LTC USAR (ret.) 🇺🇸
7 months
Yeah, it's great that we gave #Ukraine 31 M-1 Abrams tanks. But why only 31? We have literally hundreds of M-1 tanks that we could have already provided Ukraine. I have yet to hear a plausible explanation for why we have failed to do this. We need to help Ukraine achieve…
Tweet media one
539
2K
10K

Replies

@officejjsmart
Jason Jay Smart
7 months
@InfoAgeStrategy Probably because “we don’t want to provoke Russia.”
28
15
451
@InfoAgeStrategy
Dr. Fred Hoffman, LTC USAR (ret.) 🇺🇸
7 months
@officejjsmart When you listen to #Putin 's rabid lapdogs on #Russian TV (as I know you do...), you realize that Russia is already pretty provoked. But what else could they do in response? They're not going to use nukes, that much is pretty clear. So what options do they have left? Putin: "Hey,…
33
67
688
@JeffFisch
COL (Ret) Jeff in 🇦🇹
7 months
@InfoAgeStrategy We both know why. And, I'd remind ya, we ain't rocket scientists, just realists.
1
2
35
@InfoAgeStrategy
Dr. Fred Hoffman, LTC USAR (ret.) 🇺🇸
7 months
@JeffFisch Experienced realists who've been around the block a few times. Yeah.
2
4
87
@banderafella
Bandera Fella *-^
7 months
@InfoAgeStrategy @Fiona08766135 Have you guys seen how russia Lost 500 tanks in a month? Just saying 31 tank is nothing. Also they shoukd have been promised half a year ago. Arrived this month👍🏻
6
12
150
@HutsulPower
GOP For 🇺🇦 - Павло Терпелюк
7 months
@InfoAgeStrategy Biden’s cowardice
0
0
0
@VanRothrock
Van Rothrock
7 months
@InfoAgeStrategy It isn't a "stalemate." Ukraine has lost.. miserably. You've been drinking Kool-Aid.
2
0
1
@AustenLennon
Austen Julian Lennon 🇬🇧🇮🇱🇺🇦🇺🇸
7 months
@InfoAgeStrategy 100000% correct
0
0
0
@randymot4
Randy Mott
7 months
@InfoAgeStrategy We need to give them the export version, without DU in the armor. This will be the 120mm gun (NATO standard) but requires work to do the replacement armor. The DU component is top secret and closely held.
37
23
376
@hubertlepicki
Hubert Łępicki (acc/europapa)
7 months
@InfoAgeStrategy @SlawomirDebski It's by design. The strategic goal is elimination of Russian threat to the rest of the world, Europe in particular but not only, and Ukraine destroys the Russian army very nicely. The goal is not to make Ukraine win and make Russia find another enemy. Obviously the price is…
5
1
4
@skoczek1979
Łukasz Kędzierski
7 months
@InfoAgeStrategy There is workaround. Give M-1 Abrams tanks to Poland and Poland can give all left PT-91 and T-72 to Ukraine.
2
1
2
@Verivir
Verivir
7 months
@InfoAgeStrategy Was it training pipeline restrictions?
0
0
0
@vetphysician
linda saunders
7 months
@InfoAgeStrategy @officejjsmart yes yes !! please send a tweet/request to Austin @SecDef they need much more👍👍👍💯 Ukraine has benefited and they need so much more🙏🙏
0
0
6
@RedMadHatter01
Mad Red Hatter (JB)
7 months
@InfoAgeStrategy Joe Biden that is why. Never trust Joe.
0
0
2
@warrenstapleto5
warren stapleton
7 months
@InfoAgeStrategy We should send 600 (enough for two armored divisions). We even have enough to replace losses in those units when they're committed.
0
0
0
@robert_zubrin
Robert Zubrin
7 months
@InfoAgeStrategy We have 6000 M1 Abrams tanks.
4
2
32
@john_sipher
John Sipher
7 months
1
0
15
@lfstevens
Larry Stevens
7 months
@InfoAgeStrategy Tanks are mostly useless now. Too easy to kill. What they need are more drones, missiles, and shells. Some squadrons of A10s would also be nice.
4
1
10
@EleanorAquitai5
G.Flamma
7 months
@InfoAgeStrategy Why? Biden is a double talker. He has to play nice with Xi.
0
0
2
@FenixFella
AKASabraFella
7 months
@InfoAgeStrategy I want to hear our government say #UmraineMustWin and we will give them the tools they need to make this happen! Full support for Ukraine's victory!
0
0
8