@Healey_Photo
Connor Healey 🌪️
2 months
EF-x is a damage level rating. EF-5 means people are dead almost completely without exception. Give me violent tornadoes in a cornfield all day but wanting EF-5’s bc theres been a drought is… comically stupid.
45
88
1K

Replies

@Bitcoin_Redneck
Redneck Bitcoin
2 months
@Healey_Photo Oklahoma here. No interest in 4 or 5s. Ever.
1
0
29
@AnubizzzBurner
Broyles Evil Twin
2 months
@Healey_Photo You should not want an EF5. People die in EF4s(A lot of people mind you) and an EF5 is a step above that. No one survived above ground.
4
1
32
@CoreyGerkenWX
Corey Gerken
2 months
@Healey_Photo They'll wish they never saw one once the big one does happen.
3
0
88
@nilwxreports
Bob Waszak
2 months
@Healey_Photo Go off Connor
0
0
8
@ContrarianDan92
CuriousContrarian
2 months
@Healey_Photo Sadly there are likely a lot more folks who think this way… not so much the death, but the devastation and testimonial videos…
0
0
0
@Wicky_dubs_WX
Chris Wicklund Auroras
2 months
@Healey_Photo oh Connor with the fax
0
0
9
@2472742c
Crystal ✨
2 months
@Healey_Photo I agree with your point but what you said about EF-5s meaning people are dead without exception isn’t right, studies have shown that even in EF-4+ damage swaths, tornado survival rates are over 95%
2
0
4
@tknep3
Thomas Knepshield $11
2 months
@Healey_Photo I don’t want to see this again
Tweet media one
0
0
49
@Schallskiiiiii
BeatBuffalo
2 months
@Healey_Photo I laugh at tornadoes the same way I do hurricanes, stay vigilant and they wouldn’t need ratings
0
0
0
@Thanksf51663467
Thanksforallthefish
2 months
@Healey_Photo Interesting to think our own improved infrastructure, prediction, early warning communication, and greater safe space access could bump us out of meeting criteria for EF-5s almost entirely. How cool is that?!
1
0
0
@Trough_Digging
RobertWx
2 months
@Healey_Photo I’ve always thought there should be the EF scale, a damage scale; and a weak-strong-violent scale that takes into consideration radar, video, and damage. I know it would make records confusing but it would actually be more useful meteorologically imo.
0
0
1
@NobleDuke67
Dale Duke
2 months
@Healey_Photo Need a tornado size rating and then a damage rating with it. Better understanding of the situation vs just saying this 2 mile tornado tore up a cornfield with 300mph winds but is a EF 1
3
2
43
@CrossFireWx
CrossFire
2 months
@Healey_Photo People only want EF-5 because of the rarity. It's just hype based because of how far and few between there are. It's like trying to get a pair of exclusive shoes that only drop once every 5 to 10 years. I don't think people factor in how truly life changing a EF-5 tornado is.
0
0
6
@JayLesykWX
Jay Lesyk
2 months
@Healey_Photo those are just trolls wanting attention. Sad people
0
1
6
@darkmoonadept
Bevin ⛧🔱⛧ (‘Nersthusiast)
2 months
@Healey_Photo I think this indicates a disconnect between the rating system (based on damage to human built structures) and the concept of a violent tornado simply existing. Is there another way to say “I want to see an EF-5” that doesn’t automatically include death and destruction?
0
0
6
@OUsam1017
sam
2 months
@Healey_Photo That might be the smartest statement I’ve ever seen on here. Can I use that on sone of these shock jocks?
0
0
0
@Weather_Earth25
Weather & Earth 25
2 months
@Healey_Photo F5 / EF5 is something that will haunt you forever. Best case scenario would be one over open field that luckily gets rated as such due to ground scouring. Be careful what you wish for. 🌪
Tweet media one
1
0
20