at what point in the abstraction of math does it become gobbledygook?

@TonyTheLion2500 1. When It’s neither fit for teaching nor for applications to any other sciences 2. When “abstraction throws out all geometry and thus devoid of any connection to physics and reality” 3. A considerable part of the super-abstract activity comes down simply to 1/n

@TonyTheLion2500 shameless grabbing of discoveries from discoverers and then systematically assigning them to epigons-generalizers. 4. When sole objective is to prove all arbitrary corollaries of arbitrary set of theorems 5. When super-abstract generalizations is only prerequisite to be 2/n