@BBCPolitics
BBC Politics
3 years
#Marr : Do we need 80 new nuclear weapons? Defence Secretary Ben Wallace: "We need a credible nuclear deterrent"
245
33
131

Replies

@SoupTomatoSoup
TomatoSoup๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ
3 years
@BBCPolitics So was the previous ammount not credible?
1
0
1
@TheLastPersont2
The Last Girly Swots to join Twโ„๏ธtterX! ๐Ÿ’™ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ
3 years
@BBCPolitics Ben Wallace, Lisa Nandy is right - it is wrong to increase the number of nuclear warheads here in the UK and it is wrong to pay for them now over other more deserving causes... ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿปโ€โ™€๏ธ #marr #ridge
@TheLastPersont2
The Last Girly Swots to join Twโ„๏ธtterX! ๐Ÿ’™ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ
3 years
@BBCPolitics Lisa Nandy is right - it is outrageous that Boris Johnson can afford more nuclear warheads but refuses to honour his pledge of 0.7% on development aid or to pay the nurses a decent pay rise... ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿปโ€โ™€๏ธ #Marr #Ridge #BBCbh #ToryHypocrisy #BorisJohnsonOut
0
4
7
1
1
8
@Autarkh
Autarkh
3 years
@BBCPolitics @BBCNews The UK's 120-180 existing warheads are more than enough, particularly with the fallback of the under US-NATO nuclear umbrella. Building more is just throwing away money for nothing.
3
0
10
@Matt528chap
Matthew Chapman
3 years
@BBCPolitics #Marr So appalling was that car crash of an interview he's gone onto to promote the return of #LineofDuty tonight!
0
0
1
@TruthToPowerTV
Truth To Power โ“‹๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ
3 years
@BBCPolitics Spending billions of pounds to make ourselves a bigger nuclear target. The Tory world is mad, but this is exactly what authoritarian governments do.
3
0
15
@NotMyGoverment
Arni #ToriesOut ๐ŸŒน
3 years
@BBCPolitics Tories seem to like waisting taxpayers money ๐Ÿ˜ก
0
0
2
@FrancisAshling
Francis Ashling
3 years
@BBCPolitics And what else could we buy with that money? Actual troops? Ships? Nurses even?
0
0
6
@Farrell86O
Commodus
3 years
@BBCPolitics Iโ€™m pretty sure 80 world ending weapons is credible.
1
0
0
@shujatali
shujat ali
3 years
@BBCPolitics Lol, tories just want to waste taxpayers money. Look at how the ministerโ€™s face twitch to being annoyed as he has to answer a difficult question
1
1
4
@attendant1867
Andy McNaught
3 years
@BBCPolitics Why not move it closer to Westminster to protect you better maybe the Thames !
0
0
1
@Flub1957
Richard Taylor
3 years
@BBCPolitics Presumably,much as we need 10000 more regular troops, but they arenโ€™t coming, and we need around a million jobs, but no sign of them, and we need about 35 billion to pay back the spending, etc. These are plans, they may not eventuate.
0
0
1
@shujatali
shujat ali
3 years
@BBCPolitics ยฃ31 billion which will be spent over great many decades and is well within the budget. how about using a 3rd of it and giving the NHS nurses and personnel a pay rise
0
0
1
@johnengledow
John Engledow
3 years
@BBCPolitics @BBCNews Weโ€™ve got a credible nuclear deterrent. Itโ€™s called mutually assured destruction and we already have that. What we need is a credible pay increase for nurses.
0
1
20
@JamesEdmondston
James Edmondston
3 years
@BBCPolitics In which scenario is our current nuclear deterrent not sufficient?
1
0
0
@Looby13693743
Catriona
3 years
@BBCPolitics When are you going to discuss the multiple breaches of the ministerial code and ask for resignations? Of course Tories donโ€™t have to follow the rules or scrutinised but Nicola Sturgeon is fair game? Hypocrisy and Tory propaganda as always
1
1
12
@mrbfill
Phil Barrington
3 years
@BBCPolitics @BBCNews Surely 1 is 0.9999 too many? How many nuclear weapons would anyone fire?!
0
0
1
@kellylrac
Carl ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ๐ŸŒ
3 years
@BBCPolitics Nuclear deterrence continues to dominate international relations. Yet there is no proof it ever worked, nor that it ever will
Tweet media one
2
0
3
@SeanOKa74866966
Sean O'Kane
3 years
@BBCPolitics @BBCNews Never bring a knife to a gunfight
0
0
1