@Ambedo_Bass
🦝Ambedo🦝
1 year
PSA $OSMO Frontend prices are incorrect and slippage settings are seemingly being ignored. Just took over 1% slippage on a swap that was set to 1% or less, on the deepest liquidity pools in cosmos.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
7
6
56

Replies

@EthExploring
exploring.eth 🦇🔊| silent ⚛
1 year
@Ambedo_Bass I thought it should be SwapExactAmountOut ?
1
0
0
@Ambedo_Bass
🦝Ambedo🦝
1 year
@EthExploring 🤷‍♂️ not sure. All I know is I got less than the minimum I was expecting.
0
0
1
@aldibradiiiiiii
Mønday ⌐◨-◨
1 year
@Ambedo_Bass Hi sir @sunnya97 , please fix this 🥲
1
0
1
@Ambedo_Bass
🦝Ambedo🦝
1 year
@aldibradiiiiiii @sunnya97 I reported it immediately, it's being looked into. Just wanted to share so others don't have the same experience.
1
0
6
@rrvvmm0x
Mmm R
1 year
@Ambedo_Bass Compare the swapping against Crescent @CrescentHub , you‘ll get more. 😉
1
0
2
@Ambedo_Bass
🦝Ambedo🦝
1 year
@rrvvmm_ @CrescentHub yeah i use crescent sometimes, for quick swaps I will go where the rates are best. For atom thats usually osmosis.
1
0
2
@atomscpyto
atoms183
1 year
@Ambedo_Bass maybe should check the tx message content. what is the number of slippage
1
0
0
@Ambedo_Bass
🦝Ambedo🦝
1 year
@atomscpyto Yep that was something I overlooked, lesson learned. Slippage was set to 1% The actual "minimum" for the tx that went on chain was different from what the front end displayed.
0
0
1
@larry0x
Larry Engineer
1 year
@Ambedo_Bass This is weird. Your tx should have included a “minimum output amount”. A tx should have not been confirmed if the actual output amount is less than that.
0
0
0
@SCRTJS532
Johanne𝕊 ⚡️
1 year
0
0
6